When we find an archaeological network, how can we explore the necessary versus contingent processes at play in the formation of that archaeological network? Given a set of circumstances or processes, what other possible network shapes could have emerged? This is the problem of equifinality, where many different means could potentially arrive at the same end result: the networks that we observe. This paper outlines how agent-based modelling can be used as a laboratory for exploring different processes of archaeological network formation. We begin by describing our best guess about how the (ancient) world worked, given our target materials (here, the networks of production and patronage surrounding the Roman brick industry in the hinterland of Rome). We then develop an agent-based model of the Roman extractive economy which generates different kinds of networks under various assumptions about how that economy works. The rules of the simulation are built upon the work of Bang (2006; 2008) who describes a model of the Roman economy which he calls the ‘imperial Bazaar’. The agents are allowed to interact, and the investigators compare the kinds of networks this description generates over an entire landscape of economic possibilities. By rigorously exploring this landscape, and comparing the resultant networks with those observed in the archaeological materials, the investigators will be able to employ the principle of equifinality to work out the representativeness of the archaeological network and thus the underlying processes.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Agent-based modelling, Natural resources, Networks, Roman economic history, Simulation, Trade
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10816-014-9230-y
Journal Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
Citation
Graham, S, & Weingart, S. (Scott). (2014). The Equifinality of Archaeological Networks: an Agent-Based Exploratory Lab Approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(1), 248–274. doi:10.1007/s10816-014-9230-y