There are very few studies that have directly analyzed the effects of dietary intake of slowly digestible starches on metabolic parameters of animals. The present study examined the effects of slowly digestible starch with high amylose content (referred also as amylose starch) either alone, or in combination with metformin on the development, lifespan, and levels of glucose and storage lipids in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Consumption of amylose starch in concentrations 0.25–10% did not affect D. melanogaster development, whereas 20% starch delayed pupation and reduced the number of larvae that reached the pupal stage. Starch levels in larval food, but not in adult food, determined levels of triacylglycerides in eight-day-old adult flies. Rearing on diet with 20% starch led to shorter lifespan and a higher content of triacylglycerides in the bodies of adult flies as compared with the same parameters in flies fed on 4% starch diet. Food supplementation with 10 mM metformin partly attenuated the negative effects of high starch concentrations on larval pupation and decreased triacylglyceride levels in adult flies fed on 20% starch. Long-term consumption of diets supplemented with metformin and starch decreased lifespan of the insects, compared with the diet supplemented with starch only. The data show that in Drosophila high starch consumption may induce a fat fly phenotype and metformin may partially prevent it.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Developmental time, Food consumption, Pupariation, Slowly digestible starch, Triacylglycerides
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.10.011
Journal Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - A Molecular and Integrative Physiology
Citation
Abrat, O.B. (Oleksandra B.), Storey, J, Storey, K, & Lushchak, V.I. (Volodymyr I.). (2018). High amylose starch consumption induces obesity in Drosophila melanogaster and metformin partially prevents accumulation of storage lipids and shortens lifespan of the insects. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - A Molecular and Integrative Physiology, 215, 55–62. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.10.011