Environmental regulation and trade openness in the presence of private mitigation
Acknowledging the differential ability of individuals to privately mitigate the consequences of domestic pollution for their health is essential for an understanding of their demands for regulation of the environment and of trade in dirty goods, and for analysis of the implications of these demands for equilibrium policy choices. In a small open economy with exogenous policy, we first explain how private mitigation at a cost results in an unequal distribution of the health consequences of pollution in a manner consistent with epidemiologic studies, and consequently how the benefits and costs of trade in dirty goods interact with choices concerning private mitigation to further polarize the interests of citizens concerning environmental stringency. The economy is then embedded in a broader political economy setting, and simulated to investigate the role of private mitigation in shaping political equilibria. We show that when citizens can choose between mitigating the health consequences of domestic pollution privately and reducing pollution through public policy, the same polarization of interests underlies equilibrium policy choices in both democratic and autocratic regimes.
|Keywords||Autocracy, Avoidance activities, Defensive measures, Democracy, Dirty goods, Environmental regulation, Health, Individual welfare, Pollution, Private mitigation, Representation theorem, Trade|
|Journal||Journal of Development Economics|
Hotte, L. (Louis), & Winer, S. (2012). Environmental regulation and trade openness in the presence of private mitigation. Journal of Development Economics, 97(1), 46–57. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.01.004