This paper's results indicate that futures for crude oil, natural gas and unleaded gasoline fail to enhance the performance of representative energy stocks in terms of return to risk, but do decrease the overall level of risk exposure borne by passive equity investors. Our findings suggest that futures contracts on energy commodities are valuable to market participants with an interest in hedging against price fluctuations in energy markets by buy-and-hold strategies. However, this conclusion is reversed when one takes the perspective of traders whose core interests can be better approximated through the return to risk-bearing. In fact, this paper documents that return-to-risk maximizing agents are unlikely to profit from trading energy futures in addition to energy stocks. Moreover, futures for energy commodities fail to offer significant diversification gains with respect to energy stocks once investors adopt simple dynamic trading strategies that rely on readily available pricing information.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Energy markets, Mean-variance spanning, Portfolio diversification
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.05.015
Journal Energy Economics
Citation
Galvani, V. (Valentina), & Plourde, A. (2010). Portfolio diversification in energy markets. Energy Economics, 32(2), 257–268. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.05.015