Cloning and expression of PPARγ and PGC-1α from the hibernating ground squirrel, Spermophilus tridecemlineatus
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry , Volume 269 - Issue 1 p. 175- 182
The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) family of transcription factors play a key role in lipid metabolism and have been implicated in a number of disease states, most notably of which is obesity. Controlled regulation of lipid metabolism is a key ingredient for successful hibernation. Partial cDNA sequences for one of the PPAR proteins, PPARγ and the PPARγ co-activator (PGC-1α) have been cloned from the hibernating ground squirrel, Spermophilus tridecemlineatus and show differential regulation during hibernation at the mRNA level using relative RT-PCR and at the protein level via immunoblotting in brown adipose tissue (BAT), heart, skeletal muscle and white adipose tissue (WAT). The cDNA sequence for PGC-1α revealed a number of amino acid substitutions and two were worthy of note, one resulting in the loss of a potential protein kinase C (PKC) site, while another resulted in the creation of a PKC site, suggesting that PKC may be important in regulating PGC-1α. RT-PCR revealed a near 2-fold up-regulation of PPARγ in BAT and to a lesser extent (<1.5-fold) in heart and WAT, while PGC-1α displayed significantly higher levels of expression in skeletal muscle during hibernation (3.1-fold, p < 0.005). The protein levels of PPARγ were significantly increased in BAT and WAT (1.5 and 1.8-fold, respectively) while PGC-1α displayed significant changes in expression in heart (3.5-fold) and skeletal muscle (1.8-fold). Our current findings indicate a role for increased expression of PPARγ and PGC-1α in hibernating animals.
|, , , , , , ,|
|Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry|
|Organisation||Department of Chemistry|
Eddy, S.F. (Sean F.), Morin Jr., P. (Pier), & Storey, K. (2005). Cloning and expression of PPARγ and PGC-1α from the hibernating ground squirrel, Spermophilus tridecemlineatus. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, 269(1), 175–182. doi:10.1007/s11010-005-3459-4