Napoleon wrasse Cheilinus undulatus has declined drastically throughout most of its range, owing, in large part, to overexploitation. In Anaa, French Polynesia, the species is harvested as part of the subsistence catch by fishers using rockpile traps, spearguns, handmade harpoons, and baited handlines. We sampled 70 Napoleon wrasse captured by artisanal fishers of Anaa between 2015 and 2018 to assess the status of this population, and we applied data-poor fisheries models to assess the stock status of this iconic reef predator. The species was determined to be overexploited at a rate of 0.82 based on values of natural (0.14; Hoenig method) and fishing (0.58; difference of total and natural mortality) mortality as components of total mortality (0.72; Beverton-Holt estimation). The left-skewed length distribution (mean = 36 ± 13 cm SL) suggested an under-representation of large adults in the population, which would predominantly be terminal males in this sequentially hermaphroditic protogynous fish. This was not considered to be reflective of poor selectivity by gear types but could have arisen as a consequence of unequal accessibility of exceptionally deep habitats off the reef shelf. According to the length-based spawning potential ratio, Napoleon wrasse is fully recruited to this fishery prior to 50% maturation and 50% sex changing, with the spawning potential ratio estimated to be 6%, a characteristic of a highly overexploited species. Fishers were unselective towards size classes and harvest whatever they catch. Our analysis shows that even undirected, non-selective subsistence fishing yields over - exploitation of this Endangered species.

Coral reef, Fisheries modeling, Harvest, Sequential hermaphrodite, Spawning potential ratio
Endangered Species Research
Department of Biology

Lennox, R.J. (Robert J.), Filous, A. (Alexander), Cooke, S.J, & Danylchuk, A.J. (Andy J.). (2019). Substantial impacts of subsistence fishing on the population status of an Endangered reef predator at a remote coral atoll. Endangered Species Research, 38, 135–145. doi:10.3354/ESR00942