Strategic science communicators need to select tactics that can help them achieve both their short-term communication objectives and long-term behavioral goals. However, little previous research has sought to develop theory aimed at understanding what makes it more likely that a communicator will prioritize specific communication tactics. The current study aims to advance the development of a theory of strategic science communication as planned behavior based on the Integrated Behavioral Model. It does so in the context of exploring Canadian scientists’ self-reported willingness to prioritize six different tactics as a function of attitudinal, normative, and efficacy beliefs. The results suggest that scientists’ beliefs about ethicality, norms, response efficacy, and self-efficacy, are all meaningful predictors of willingness to prioritize specific tactics. Differences between scientists in terms of demographics and related variables provide only limited benefit in predicting such willingness.

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224039
Journal PLoS ONE
Citation
Besley, J.C. (John C.), O'Hara, K, & Dudo, A. (Anthony). (2019). Strategic science communication as planned behavior: Understanding scientists’ willingness to choose specific tactics. PLoS ONE, 14(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224039