Experimental parameters leading to optimal bilayers for total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy visualization
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 23 - Issue 1 p. 97- 112
Supported lipid bilayer systems were evaluated following various experimental procedures in an effort to determine their appropriateness for visualization using total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. The incorporation and distribution of Texas Red® 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (TR-DHPE) was studied when incorporated into bilayers of variable lipid composition using different forms of mechanical shearing. Results showed that 0.8 mol% TR-DHPE provides the most optimum TIRF images. At this concentration, a sufficient level of photostability can be achieved without an undesirable increase in TR-DHPE aggregates caused by excess probe molecules. Solutions composed of a 3:1 molar ratio of DOPC:DPPC with 0.8 mol% TR-DHPE produce bilayers that consistently display clear, distinct, rounded domains, whereas other lipid compositions did not. This optimum phase separation appears to be influenced by an increase in mechanical shearing during the vesicle formation process, when the lipid solutions were exposed to sonication and extrusion processes. The combination of a sonication and extrusion process also helped with eliminating the presence of TR-DHPE aggregates within the model membranes. It was also shown that bilayers formed on conditioned glass, placed on a slide, produced more highly detailed bilayers in which distinct lipid phase separation could be optimally visualized using TIRF microscopy.
|Extrusion, Lipid phase separation, Small unilamellar vesicles, Supported lipid bilayers, Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy|
|Microscopy and Microanalysis|
|Organisation||Department of Chemistry|
Mantil, E. (Elisabeth), Crippin, T. (Trinda), Ianoul, A.I, & Avis, T. (2017). Experimental parameters leading to optimal bilayers for total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy visualization. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 23(1), 97–112. doi:10.1017/S1431927617000083