Monte Carlo calculated absorbed-dose energy dependence of EBT and EBT2 film
Medical Physics , Volume 37 - Issue 3 p. 1110- 1116
Purpose: The absorbed-dose energy dependence of GAFCHROMIC EBT and EBT2 film irradiated in photon beams is studied to understand the shape of the curves and the physics behind them. Methods: The absorbed-dose energy dependence is calculated using the EGSnrc-based EGS-chamber and DOSRZnrc codes by calculating the ratio of dose to water to dose to active film layers at photon energies ranging from 3 keV to 18 MeV. These data are compared to the mass energy absorption coefficient ratios and the restricted stopping power ratios of water to active film materials as well as to previous experimental results. Results: In the photon energy range of 100 keV to 18 MeV the absorbed-dose energy dependence is found to be energy independent within ±0.6%. However, below 100 keV, the absorbed-dose energy dependence of EBT varies by approximately 10% due to changes in mass energy absorption coefficient ratios of water to film materials, as well as an increase in the number of electrons being created and scattered in the central surface layer of the film. Results are found to disagree with previous experimental studies suggesting the possibility of an intrinsic energy dependence at lower photon energies. For EBT2 film the absorbed-dose energy dependence at low photon energies varies by 50% or 10% depending on the manufacturing lot due to changes in the ratio of mass energy absorption coefficients of the active emulsion layers to water. Conclusions: Caution is recommended when using GAFCHROMIC EBT/EBT2 films at photon energies below 100 keV. It is recommended that the effective atomic number of future films be produced as close to that of water and that thicker active layers are advantageous.
|Absorbed-dose energy dependence, EBT, EBT2, EGSnrc, Monte Carlo, Radiochromic film|
|Organisation||Department of Physics|
Sutherland, J.G.H., & Rogers, D.W.O. (2010). Monte Carlo calculated absorbed-dose energy dependence of EBT and EBT2 film. Medical Physics, 37(3), 1110–1116. doi:10.1118/1.3301574