Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from Arctic mudboils
Climate change is expected to alter the Arctic's carbon (C) balance and changes in these C-rich ecosystems may contribute to a positive feedback on global climate change. Low-center mudboils, a form of patterned ground in the Arctic, are distinct landforms in which the exchange of greenhouse gases between the atmosphere and soil has not been fully characterized, but which may have an important influence on the overall C balance of tundra ecosystems. Chamber systems were used to sample net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE) and CO2 and CH4 effluxes along a 35-m transect intersecting two mudboils in a wet sedge fen in Canada's Southern Arctic (lat. 64°52′N, long. 111°34′W) during the summer months in 2008. Mudboil features gave rise to dramatic variations in vegetation, soil temperature and thaw depth, and soil organic matter content along this transect. Variations in NEE were driven by variations in the amount of vascular vegetation, while CO2 and CH4 effluxes were remarkably similar among the two mudboil (CO2 effluxes: 1.1±0.9 and 1.4±0.7 μmol m-2s-1; CH4 effluxes: 83.1±189.4 and 23.1±9.4 nmol m-2 s-1, ±1 standard deviation) and the sedge fen (CO2 effluxes: 1.6±0.7 μmol m-2 s-1; CH4 effluxes: 28.0±62.0 nmol m-2s-1) sampling areas. Vegetation appeared to play an important role in limiting temporal variations in CH 4 effluxes through plant mediated transport in both mudboil and sedge fen sampling areas. One of the mudboils had negligible vascular plant colonization presumably due to more active frost heave processes. The relatively high CO2 and CH4 efflux in this mudboil area was speculated to be a result of growth and decomposition of cryptogamic organisms, inflow of dissolved organic C, and warmer soil temperatures.
|Keywords||Carbon dioxide, Methane, Net ecosystem exchange, Nonsorted circle, Patterned ground, Tundra|
|Journal||Canadian Journal of Soil Science|
Wilson, K.S., & Humphreys, E. (2010). Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from Arctic mudboils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 90(3), 441–449. doi:10.4141/CJSS09073