Globally, women's movements share the twin concerns of equality within the family and freedom from domestic violence. The following questions conjoin and animate these debates: Given that violence against women is a global phenomenon, why are some states more effective at controlling domestic violence than others? What is the correlation between inequality encoded in family laws and the rate of violence against women in society? Are legally plural states more likely to demonstrate a higher degree of institutionalized inequality and gender-based violence within the family? The analytical peg for Hudson, Bowen, and Nielsen (2012) is the feminist evolutionary analytic approach (FEAA) that explains the almost universal prevalence of male dominance among humans during the course of formation of societies. It suggests that violence against women is greater in legal systems that design family law to maximize men's rights. Copyright

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1200075X
Journal Politics and Gender
Citation
Solanki, G. (2013). The retelling of tales: Disentangling the feminist evolutionary analytic approach, legal pluralism, and gender justice. Politics and Gender (Vol. 9, pp. 105–110). doi:10.1017/S1743923X1200075X