Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) and the Ethics of Body and Place: Critical Methodological Reflections
This article is a critical methodological reflection on the use of interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) initiated in the context of a qualitative research project on the experience of seclusion in a psychiatric setting. It addresses an explicit gap in the IPA literature to explore the ways that Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology can extend the remit of IPA for noncognitivist qualitative research projects beyond the field of health psychology. In particular, the article develops Merleau-Ponty's understanding of the lived-body, language, and embodied speech, with specific attention to the ethical implications of body and place. It concludes with a discussion on phenomenological reflexivity and prompts a reconsideration of phenomenological methods across a wide range of qualitative research projects concerned with subjectivity and ethical practice, including critical health studies, critical bioethics, and cultural studies that employ a qualitative empirical research design.
|Keywords||Critical methods, Embodiment, Ethics, Interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA), Lived body, Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology, Qualitative research|
Murray, S.J, & Holmes, D. (Dave). (2014). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) and the Ethics of Body and Place: Critical Methodological Reflections. Human Studies, 37(1), 15–30. doi:10.1007/s10746-013-9282-0